mirror of
https://gitee.com/ant-design/ant-design.git
synced 2024-12-05 05:28:20 +08:00
114 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
114 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
|||
|
title: getContainer 的一些变化
|
|||
|
date: 2022-12-08
|
|||
|
author: zombieJ
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
在网页开发中,我们时长会遇到弹出元素的需求,比如 Select 的下拉框、或者是 Modal 组件。直接将其渲染到当前节点下时,可能会被父节点的 `overflow: hidden` 裁剪掉:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![Overflow](https://mdn.alipayobjects.com/huamei_7uahnr/afts/img/A*Noh-TYJ0BdcAAAAAAAAAAAAADrJ8AQ/original)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
因而在 Ant Design 中,我们默认将其渲染到 `body` 下,但是这又会带来新的问题。由于不在同一个容器下,当用户滚动屏幕时会发现弹出层并未跟随滚动:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![Scroll](https://mdn.alipayobjects.com/huamei_7uahnr/afts/img/A*d44KQqkTX90AAAAAAAAAAAAADrJ8AQ/original)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
为了解决这个问题,我们提供了 `getContainer` 属性,让用户可以自定义渲染的容器。`getContainer` 方法会在组件挂载时调用,返回一个容器节点,组件会通过 `createPortal` 渲染到这个节点下。
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
```tsx
|
|||
|
// Fake Code. Just for Demo
|
|||
|
const PopupWrapper = () => {
|
|||
|
const eleRef = React.useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null);
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
React.useEffect(() => {
|
|||
|
// It's much complex with timing in real world. You can view the source for more detail:
|
|||
|
// https://github.com/react-component/portal/blob/master/src/Portal.tsx
|
|||
|
const container: HTMLElement = getContainer(eleRef.current);
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
// ...
|
|||
|
}, []);
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
return (
|
|||
|
<div ref={eleRef}>
|
|||
|
{...}
|
|||
|
</div>
|
|||
|
);
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
```tsx
|
|||
|
// Fake Code. Just for Demo
|
|||
|
const defaultGetContainer = () => {
|
|||
|
const div = document.createElement('div');
|
|||
|
document.body.appendChild(div);
|
|||
|
return div;
|
|||
|
};
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
const SomeComponent = ({ getContainer = defaultGetContainer }) => (
|
|||
|
<PopupWrapper getContainer={getContainer} />
|
|||
|
);
|
|||
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
我们暂时不关注 `getContainer` 需要动态切换挂载节点的需求(其实在过去很长时间它的确也无法切换),仅仅从 React 18 看,它遇到了一些问题。
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## React 18 Concurrent Mode
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
React 18 中,effect 可能会多次触发。为了防止不经意间破坏开发者的行为,在 [StrictMode](https://reactjs.org/docs/strict-mode.html) 下它也做了相应的调整:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> - React mounts the component.
|
|||
|
> - Layout effects are created.
|
|||
|
> - Effect effects are created.
|
|||
|
> - React simulates effects being destroyed on a mounted component.
|
|||
|
> - Layout effects are destroyed.
|
|||
|
> - Effects are destroyed.
|
|||
|
> - React simulates effects being re-created on a mounted component.
|
|||
|
> - Layout effects are created
|
|||
|
> - Effect setup code runs
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
简单理解就是 StrictMode 下,即便你的 deps 里是空对象,effect 仍然会多次触发。在切换为 React 18 StrictMode 的时候,我们会发现在 HTML 中会成对出现挂载节点,同时前一个是空的:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
```html
|
|||
|
<body>
|
|||
|
<div id="root">...</div>
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
<!-- Empty -->
|
|||
|
<div className="sample-holder"></div>
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
<!-- Real in use -->
|
|||
|
<div className="sample-holder">
|
|||
|
<div className="ant-component-wrapper">...</div>
|
|||
|
</div>
|
|||
|
</body>
|
|||
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
因而我们调整了调用实现,默认的 `getContainer` 也通过 state 进行管理,确保在 StrictMode 下会清理前一个 effect 生成的节点:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
```tsx
|
|||
|
// Fake Code. Just for Demo
|
|||
|
const SomeComponent = ({ getContainer }) => {
|
|||
|
const [myContainer, setMyContainer] = React.useState<HTMLElement | null>(null);
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
React.useEffect(() => {
|
|||
|
if (getContainer) {
|
|||
|
setMyContainer(getContainer());
|
|||
|
return;
|
|||
|
}
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
const div = document.createElement('div');
|
|||
|
document.body.appendChild(div);
|
|||
|
setMyContainer(div);
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
return () => {
|
|||
|
document.body.removeChild(div);
|
|||
|
};
|
|||
|
}, [getContainer]);
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
return <PopupWrapper getContainer={() => myContainer} />;
|
|||
|
};
|
|||
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
将 `getContainer` 放入 effect 管理后,我们可以更符合 React 生命周期的方式去管理节点,同时也可以在 `getContainer` 变化时进行清理。从而支持动态改变 `getContainer` 的场景(虽然我个人比较怀疑这种使用场景的普遍性)。
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## 最后
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
由于修复了 `getContainer` 不支持动态改变的问题,它也引入了一个潜在的 breaking change。开发者如果自定义 `getContainer` 每次都是创建新的 dom 节点时,它就会因为 effect 不断执行,导致节点不断创建而死循环。如果你使用了这种方式并且遇到了问题,需要注意检查。
|