mirror of
https://gitee.com/gitea/gitea.git
synced 2024-12-15 10:00:49 +08:00
ec8ea58dbe
Mainstream frameworks: * https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.0/components/buttons/ * https://primer.style/css/components/buttons#link-button * https://nextui.org/docs/components/button#light * https://coreui.io/react/docs/components/button/ * https://design-system.hpe.design/components/button * https://chakra-ui.com/docs/components/button/usage#button-variants * https://mui.com/material-ui/react-button/ All (at least most?) of them make "link" button have "underline" when hovering. So, a "link" is a "link", when it's hovered, it should have the underline by default. To be strict, Gitea's "button-link" is not link-style, so it needs a better name. Actually, for the "plain" button, there are some different approaches: * Some frameworks just make "default" button as no style (not feasible in Gitea/Fomantic UI) * Primer uses "btn-invisible", which is not a proper word * NextUI uses "light", which is not a proper word, either ... * CoreUI / ChakraUI uses "ghost", I think this name is acceptable. Welcome to suggest better name for such button. Or, we just call it ".button-plain" or ".button-simple", in fact I prefer such simple and clear name. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
chroma | ||
code | ||
codemirror | ||
console | ||
editor | ||
features | ||
markup | ||
modules | ||
repository | ||
shared | ||
standalone | ||
themes | ||
admin.css | ||
animations.css | ||
base.css | ||
dashboard.css | ||
editor.css | ||
explore.css | ||
font_i18n.css | ||
form.css | ||
helpers.css | ||
home.css | ||
index.css | ||
install.css | ||
organization.css | ||
repository.css | ||
review.css | ||
runner.css | ||
svg.css | ||
tribute.css | ||
user.css |