From b1fe7c30f3e39f7d73c21e768b4dee15bc053828 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yanliang567 <82361606+yanliang567@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:33:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [skip e2e]Update miluvs component names (#13875) Signed-off-by: yanliang567 --- docs/design_docs/drop_collection_release_resources_en.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/design_docs/drop_collection_release_resources_en.md b/docs/design_docs/drop_collection_release_resources_en.md index ac328798bb..b33b2c490d 100644 --- a/docs/design_docs/drop_collection_release_resources_en.md +++ b/docs/design_docs/drop_collection_release_resources_en.md @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ DataCoord Pros: 1. The easiest approach in both DataNode and DataCoord. - 2. DN can reuse the current flush manager procedure. + 2. DataNode can reuse the current flush manager procedure. Cons: 1. The No. rpc call is equal to the No. segments in a collection, expensive.